Bad credit personal loan, unsecured no credit check credit card

Application for a high risk, bad credit personal loan with no credit check and an unsecured credit card with instant approval decision.

 

Credit Applications

 

Auto Loan: New & used auto loans & refinancing

 

Credit Card: Secured & unsecured credit card offers

 

Credit Report: Order a free credit report copy online

 

Debt Relief: Counseling, consolidation & settlement

 

New Home Loan: Multiple new home loan rate quotes

 

Mortgage Refi: Refinance or get a mortgage equity loan

 

Personal Loan: Good or bad credit personal loan approval

Credit Articles

Financial News

Recent Articles

RSS Feeds Syndication

Site Map

Search Articles



Advanced Search

Search Credit Federal


Click HERE to Subscribe!



Popular Financial Articles
  1. Spot Counterfeit Money
  2. Bad Credit Personal Loan FAQs
  3. High Risk Cosigner Loan
  4. High Risk Personal Loan Application
  5. Preapproved Credit Card
No popular articles found.

 »  Articles  »  News  »  2 Mortgages Comparison
Credit Federal
Personal loan and credit card resource serving millions of good and bad credit U.S. consumers.

View all news by Credit Federal...
2 Mortgages Comparison
By Credit Federal | Published 04/7/2008
A comparison of 2 mortgages from 2 people with identical bad credit histories; one a balloon ARM and the other a 30 year fixed rate.

As the mortgage crisis rolls on, the arguments as to whether or not the federal government should step-in also wage on, as does the finger pointing of blame.

To answer the question as to whether or not the federal government should bail out subprime mortgage lenders; and/or the bad credit people who accepted such loans, let's compare two different loans from two households that have identical income and credit histories.

Mortgage "A" - Rich and Goldie Spendhappy have a six year old child. The Spendhappys choose a 4,000 square foot home in a posh neighborhood. Their mortgage totals $325,000. With no down payment, a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 6% would cost $1,948.53 per month. The only way the Spendhappys can afford the home is to accept an ARM mortgage.

Mortgage "B" - Buck and Charity Wisespender also have a six year old child. The Wisespenders choose a modest 1,800 square foot home in a typical suburb. Their mortgage totals $160,000. With no down payment, a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 6% would cost $959.28 per month. Since this amount is less than half of what the Spendhappys monthly payment would be, the Spendwisers can afford this home with a standard 30 year fixed rate mortgage. They don't need to accept an ARM mortgage.

After 5 years, the Spendhappys get bad news. Their new mortgage payments are going to be much, much higher as their ARM adjusts. Their new payments will be well beyond their ability to keep up payments. The Spendhappys are very upset indeed. They didn't understand the ARM program, and they don't want to lose their home to foreclosure. They try hard to work with the lender to either refinance or to negotiate an affordable payments, but they cannot pinpoint exactly who the lender is because mortgage companies don't readily release such information. Eventually, they contact their legislatures for help.

Meanwhile, other people like the Spendhappys are also burdened with ARMs and are falling behind on their payments. They; too, try to negotiate but are unsuccessful. They also contact their legislatures.

What's going on with the Wisespenders during all this? They are continuing to make their monthly mortgage payments.

What's going on in the minds of legislatures? They are wondering how they help the bad credit people who took on ARM mortages, but mainly they're wondering if they should help them at all? And what about the banks that went under who had loaned money to bad credit people who defaulted? Should the banks be bailed out?

But; once again, what about the Wisespenders? They didn't borrow more than they could afford. Instead of getting an extravagant, large home that costs over double what they could afford with a 30 year mortgage, they chose a modest, affordable home and they made all their payments on time. Shouldn't they be rewarded for being wise spenders?

Instead of rewarding wise spenders, legislatures are considering punishment via tax increases on people like the Wisespenders, so they can give money to people like the Spendhappys who don't wisely manage their personal budget. And to possibly share that money with the banks who pushed ARMs.

Is it fair to the Wisespenders, who didn't purchase a home larger than they needed nor more costly than they could afford, to be forced via taxes to help bail out irresponsible people like the Spendhappys? No, it wouldn't be fair.

So what would be fair? How could people like the Spendhappys be helped without punishing people like the Wisespenders? Instead of giving free money to people who have ARMs they can no longer afford, perhaps legislatures should force lenders to convert the loan to a fixed rate mortgage, even if it means a 50 year payment program versus the standard 30 year plan if that's what it takes to make the monthly payment affordable.

Comments


 Share this Financial Article with a Friend - click here

Webmasters: Free Financial Content for Your Website!

Multiple ways to use our financial content:

1) You can use our RSS Feeds for automatic insertion and updates

2) You can simply link to this article

3) You can copy/paste the HTML code below (do not remove any links).